ENAMEL DEMINERALIZATION IN CHILDREN AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR ITS EARLY DETECTION
Keywords:
Keywords: enamel demineralization, children, early diagnosis, non-invasive detection, QLF, DIAGNOdent, caries prevention, pediatric dentistry, remineralization, dental technologyAbstract
Annotation: Enamel demineralization in children is a critical early stage of dental caries that often goes unnoticed until irreversible damage occurs. Identifying and managing demineralization at its earliest stage is essential to prevent the progression to cavitated lesions. This article explores the etiological factors contributing to enamel demineralization in pediatric patients, including diet, oral hygiene, and systemic influences. It also reviews modern diagnostic technologies used for early detection, such as laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent), quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF), electrical conductance measurements, and digital imaging fiber-optic transillumination (DIFOTI). Emphasis is placed on the importance of early, non-invasive diagnosis to enable preventive and remineralization therapies that preserve tooth structure and improve long-term oral health outcomes in children.
References
1. Amaechi, B. T., Higham, S. M., & Edgar, W. M. (2001). Factors affecting the development of carious lesions in dental enamel. Caries Research, 35(5), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047475
2. Lussi, A., Megert, B., Shellis, R. P., & Wang, X. (2010). Analysis of the erosive effect of different dietary substances and medications on primary and permanent teeth. Caries Research, 44(5), 445–450. https://doi.org/10.1159/000318569
3. Pretty, I. A. (2006). Caries detection and diagnosis: Novel technologies. Journal of Dentistry, 34(10), 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.06.002
4. Aljehani, A. (2015). Diagnostic applications of cone beam CT for periodontal diseases. International Journal of Dentistry, 2014, Article ID 865079. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/865079
5. Shi, X. Q., Tranaeus, S., & Angmar-Månsson, B. (2000). Comparison of QLF and DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth surface caries. Caries Research, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016608
6. Lussi, A., & Hellwig, E. (2006). Performance of a laser fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Research, 40(5), 424–429. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094285
7. Kuhnisch, J., Goddon, I., Berger, S., Senkel, H., & Hickel, R. (2008). An in vivo comparison of different techniques for the detection of approximal caries lesions. Quintessence International, 39(6), e26–e31.
8. Ekstrand, K. R., Qvist, V., & Thylstrup, A. (1987). Light microscope study of the effect of probing in occlusal surfaces. Caries Research, 21(4), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261043
9. Bagramian, R. A., Garcia-Godoy, F., & Volpe, A. R. (2009). The global increase in dental caries: A pending public health crisis. American Journal of Dentistry, 22(1), 3–8.
10. Pitts, N. B. (2004). Clinical diagnosis of dental caries: A European perspective. Journal of Dental Education, 68(10), 1046–1051. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2004.68.10.tb03843.x
