EFFECTIVE METHODS TO ENHANCE STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN FINE ARTS LESSONS.
Keywords:
KEYWORDS: Student motivation, fine arts education, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, creative engagement, teaching strategies, project-based learning, collaborative learning, artistic competence, classroom innovation.Abstract
ANNOTATION: This article explores effective methods to enhance students’ motivation in fine arts education. It emphasizes that motivation plays a crucial role in students’ engagement, creativity, and overall academic success. The study highlights strategies that teachers can employ to foster intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, including interactive teaching methods, project-based learning, collaborative activities, and the use of visual and digital resources. Drawing on research by S.A. Shovdirov and other educational scholars, the article examines how motivational techniques impact student participation, self-directed learning, and the development of artistic competence.
References
1. Shavdirov, S. A. (2017). Selection criteria of training methods in design fine arts lessons. Eastern European Scientific Journal, (1), 131–134.
2. Shovdirov, S. A. (2024). Analyzing the sources and consequences of atmospheric pollution: A case study of the Navoi region. E3S Web of Conferences, 587, 02016. EDP Sciences.
3. Shavdirov, S. (2025). Method of organization of classes in higher education institutions using flipped classroom technology. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3268(1), 070035. AIP Publishing LLC.
4. Shovdirov, S. A. (2024). Tasviriy san’atni o‘qitishda o‘quvchilarning sohaga oid o‘quv kompetensiyalarini shakllantirish omillari. Inter Education & Global Study, (1), 8–14.
5. Ibraimov, X., & Shovdirov, S. (2023). Theoretical principles of the formation of study competencies regarding art literacy in students. Science and Innovation, 2(B10), 192–198.
6. Baymetov, B. B., & Shovdirov, S. A. (2023). Methods of organizing practical and theoretical classes for students in the process of teaching fine arts. International Journal on Integrated Education, 4(3), 60–66.
7. Shovdirov, S. A. (2018). Izobrazitelnomu i prikladnomu iskusstvu. International Scientific Review of the Problems and Prospects of Modern Science and Education, 84–85.
8. Shavdirov, S. A. (2017). Podgotovka budushchikh uchiteley k issledovatelskoy deyatelnosti. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka, (2), 109–110.
9. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins.
11. Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer.
12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
13. Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.
14. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Pearson Education.
