A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMMEDIATE POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES: AORTOCORONARY BYPASS SURGERY VIA MINITHORACOTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MEDIAN STERNOTOMY IN ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

Authors

  • Khalikulov Khusan PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery and Transplantology, Faculty No.
  • Makhammatov Orzu Master’s degree, Department of Surgery and Transplantology, Faculty No. 2
  • Irisov Ortiqali DSc, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery and Transplantology, Faculty No. 2
  • Mirolimov Miraziz PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery and Transplantology, Faculty No. 2

Keywords:

Ischemic Heart Disease; Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG); Minithoracotomy; Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS); Immediate Outcomes; Surgical Revascularization.

Abstract

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. While conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) via median sternotomy is the gold standard for surgical revascularization, it is associated with significant surgical trauma. Minimally invasive approaches, such as CABG via minithoracotomy, have been developed to mitigate these adverse effects. This study aims to evaluate the immediate postoperative outcomes of aortocoronary bypass surgery performed via a left anterior small thoracotomy compared to the traditional sternotomy approach. Clinical data from a matched cohort of patients with IHD will be analyzed, focusing on intraoperative parameters, postoperative recovery times, and the incidence of immediate complications. Early evidence suggests that the minithoracotomy approach provides comparable revascularization efficacy while significantly reducing blood loss, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay.

References

1. Bonatti, J., Wallner, S., Winkler, B., & Grabenwöger, M. (2021). Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: Current status and future prospects. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 19(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2021.1889366

2. Doenst, T., Haverich, A., Serruys, P., Bonow, R. O., Kappetein, P., Falk, V., ... & Mohr, F. W. (2019). PCI and CABG for severe epicardial coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 73(8), 964–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.059

3. Gaudino, M., Bakaeen, F., Davierwala, P., Di Franco, A., Fremes, S. E., Patel, N. C., ... & Taggart, D. P. (2020). New strategies for surgical myocardial revascularization. Circulation, 142(14), 1324–1338. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046556

4. Holzhey, D. M., Cornely, J. P., Rastan, A. J., Davierwala, P., & Mohr, F. W. (2022). Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery (MIDCAB): 20 years of experience at the Leipzig Heart Center. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 11(3), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2021-midcab-22

5. Nuelle, J., & Weaver, A. (2023). Accelerated recovery protocols in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: A review of current evidence. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 165(2), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.01.015

Downloads

Published

2026-06-08

How to Cite

Khalikulov Khusan, Makhammatov Orzu, Irisov Ortiqali, & Mirolimov Miraziz. (2026). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMMEDIATE POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES: AORTOCORONARY BYPASS SURGERY VIA MINITHORACOTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MEDIAN STERNOTOMY IN ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE. NEW APPROACHES IN EDUCATION: PEDAGOGY, INNOVATION, AND DEVELOPMENT, 2(06), 186–189. Retrieved from https://worldconferences.us/index.php/nae/article/view/1437