KESARCHA KESISHDAN KEYIN BACHADON CHANDIG‘I REPARATSIYASINI OPTIMALLASHTIRISHDA BLOODSTOPNING SAMARADORLIGI
Keywords:
Kalit so‘zlar: kesarcha kesish, BloodStop, miometriy, gemostatik vosita, bachadon chandig‘i, reparatsiya, ultratovush, morfologik tahlil, fibroz, regeneratsiya.Abstract
Annotatsiya.
Mazkur tadqiqotning maqsadi kesarcha kesish operatsiyasida BloodStop gemostatik Mazkur tadqiqot kesarcha kesish operatsiyasida BloodStop gemostatik vositasining miometriy reparatsiyasi va bachadon chandig‘i shakllanishiga taʼsirini klinik va eksperimental jihatdan baholashga qaratildi. Bemorlar uch guruhga ajratildi: nazorat, anʼanaviy gemostatik gellar qo‘llanilgan va BloodStop qo‘llanilgan guruh. Ultratovush va morfologik tahlillar natijalari BloodStop qo‘llanilganda bachadon involyutsiyasi tezlashishi, chandiq qalinligi va mustahkamligi oshishi hamda miometriy yupqalashishi kamayishini ko‘rsatdi. Eksperimental tadqiqotlarda mazkur vosita minimal yallig‘lanish reaksiyasi va fibrozning past darajasi bilan xarakterlangan optimal reparativ jarayonlarni taʼminladi. Olingan natijalar BloodStopning yuqori samaradorligi va miometriyning funksional tiklanishini yaxshilashdagi ahamiyatini tasdiqlaydi.
References
1. Betrán, A.P., Ye, J., Moller, A.B., Zhang, J., Gülmezoglu, A.M. & Torloni, M.R. (2016). The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates. PLOS ONE, 11(2), e0148343.
2. WHO (2021). WHO recommendations on non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. Geneva: World Health Organization.
3. Silver, R.M. (2012). Implications of the first cesarean: perinatal and future reproductive health. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 119(2), pp. 329–340.
4. Tower, A.M. & Frishman, G.N. (2013). Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 20(5), pp. 562–572.
5. Heller, D.S. (2016). Pathology of cesarean section scars. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 59(3), pp. 495–503.
6. Di Spiezio Sardo, A., Calagna, G., Scognamiglio, M. et al. (2017). Prevention of cesarean scar defect: state of the art. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 219, pp. 19–23.
7. Chapron, C., Vannuccini, S., Santulli, P. et al. (2019). Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Human Reproduction Update, 25(3), pp. 392–411.
8. Pereira, L., Reddy, U.M. & Berghella, V. (2015). Cesarean scar thickness and risk of uterine rupture. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 212(2), pp. 232–240.
9. Ahmed, T.A.E., Dare, E.V. & Hincke, M. (2008). Fibrin: a versatile scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Engineering Part B, 14(2), pp. 199–215.
10. Balakrishnan, B. & Jayakrishnan, A. (2005). Self-cross-linking biopolymers as injectable in situ forming biodegradable scaffolds. Biomaterials, 26(18), pp. 3941–3951.
