STRUCTURAL-SEMANTIC MODELS OF COMPOUND HISTORICAL ANTHROPONYMS IN THE UZBEKISTAN LANGUAGE.
Keywords:
Keywords: anthroponymy, onomastics, compound names, structural model, semantic model, etymology, theophoric names, historical lexicon, component, affixation.Abstract
Abstract. This article explores the linguistic nature of compound historical anthroponyms, which are an important part of Uzbek onomastics. Personal names with complex structures from various historical sources and archival documents were selected as the object of research. The article highlights the structural patterns of name formation and their semantic scope using comparative-historical and descriptive methods. Furthermore, anthroponymic models resulting from the mutual integration of Turkic, Arabic, and Persian layers are classified, and their etymological basis is revealed.
References
1. Begmatov E. The meaning of Uzbek names. – Tashkent: National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan, 2007. – 604 p.
2. Nafasov T. Issues of Uzbek onomastics. – Karshi: Nasaf, 1994. – 120 p.
3. Sattorov U. History of Uzbek names. – Tashkent: Science, 1996. – 180 p.
4. Gafurov A. Names and fates. – Tashkent: Sharq, 2005. – 256 p. 5. Nikonov V.A. Name and society. – Moscow: Science, 1974. – 278 p.
6. Mahmud Kashgari. Dictionary of Turkish. 3 volumes. – Tashkent: Science, 1963.
7. Shokhabiddinova Sh. Onomastics of the Uzbek language. – Andijan, 2020.
8. Dosimov Z. The relationship between ethnonyms and place names. – Tashkent: Fan, 1988.
